11 Executive Officers and the Endowments Act · 11.1 Executive Officers and the Endowments Act

11.1.3 The Endowments Act 1987: framework

Act 30 of 1987, built on the Justice Challa Kondaiah Commission's report, governs every Hindu religious and charitable institution in Andhra Pradesh: it defines the institutions, sorts them by income, sets up trust boards, the Commissioner's department, the Dharmika Parishad and the Endowments Tribunal, abolishes hereditary rights, and rests on the State's power under Articles 25–26 to regulate the secular side of religion.

  • APPSC Paper I
  • Standard level
  • 13 min read
  • Free

Free PDF

Download this PDF

Enter your email once and the PDF is yours. We send exam updates and free material; you can stop them any time.

In the print window, choose Save as PDF.

Core facts

  • Full name: the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 (Act 30 of 1987), in force from 28-5-1987.
  • Basis: the Justice Challa Kondaiah Commission (asked 2023), which reported on 28-2-1986. The 1987 Act repealed the A.P. Act of 1966 (Act 17 of 1966) and the TTD Act of 1979.
  • Main amendments: Act 33 of 2007 (Dharmika Parishad, Endowments Tribunal, new S.29); Act 36 of 2023 (new S.83 on encroachments, Ss.84–86 omitted); Act 26 of 2024 (bigger trust boards, a Brahmin trustee, in force 10-2-2025).
  • Chapters to remember: III administration (Ss.14–42), V mutts (Ss.47–55), VII budget, accounts and audit (Ss.57–64), X alienation and inams (Ss.75–82), XI encroachments (S.83), XII Tribunal inquiries (Ss.87–89), XIV TTD (Ss.95–131).
  • Key sections: S.6 classification; S.15 Board of Trustees (asked 2023); S.16 hereditary trusteeship abolished; S.29 EO; S.34 hereditary rights of archakas and mirasidars abolished; S.144 shares in hundi and rusums abolished (asked 2023); S.152 Dharmika Parishad (asked 2023); S.162 Endowments Tribunal.
  • Dharmika Parishad: 21 members; Chairman = Minister for Endowments (asked 2023); Member Secretary = Commissioner. It may remove a Mathadhipati (asked 2023).
  • Tribunal Chairman: a judicial officer not below the rank of District Judge (asked 2023); Member: not below Additional Commissioner.
  • Code of conduct for trustees, archakas and office-holders: framed by the Commissioner (2023 key).
  • Constitution: Article 25(2)(a) lets the State regulate the economic and secular side of religious practice; Article 26 gives denominations the right to manage their own religious affairs. The subject is in the Concurrent List (entry 28).

Explained

How the law grew.

YearLaw
1843East India Company withdraws from temple management (TTD goes to the Hathiramji Mahants)
1939Hyderabad Endowments Regulations: Telangana area
1951Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act (Act 19 of 1951): Andhra area
1966A.P. Act 17 of 1966: one law for the whole State
1979TTD Act, 1979
1986Challa Kondaiah Commission reports (28-2-1986)
1987Act 30 of 1987 replaces the 1966 and 1979 Acts

Definitions in Section 2 that are asked.

ClauseTermMeaning
2(1)ArchakaIncludes a pujari, panda, archakatvam mirasidar or anyone who does puja; an EO is not an archaka (asked 2023)
2(5)Charitable purposeRelief of poverty or distress, education, medical relief, other public utility not solely religious
2(10)DharmadayamMoney collected by custom or trade usage for a charitable or religious purpose
2(11)DittamScale of daily dhupa, deepa, naivedya and other services and the articles needed
2(17)MathReligious institution headed by a person who teaches Hindu religion or philosophy
2(21)Religious charityA public charity associated with a Hindu festival or religious observance (asked 2023)
2(23)Religious institutionA math, temple or specific endowment, including a brindavan or samadhi
2(25)Specific endowmentProperty given for a particular service or charity in an institution
2(29)TrusteeIncludes mathadhipati, mahant, dharmakarta, mutawalli and a Board of Trustees
2(30)HinduIncludes Buddhists, Jains and Sikhs

The Act does not apply to wakfs under the Wakf Act (S.1(3)).

Trust boards (Ss.14–28).

  • S.14: the property vests in the institution; trustees only manage it.
  • S.15 (as amended by Act 26 of 2024):
Annual incomeBoard appointed byMembers
Above ₹20 croreGovernment17
₹5 crore – ₹20 croreGovernment13
₹1 crore – ₹5 croreGovernment11
₹25 lakh – ₹1 croreDharmika Parishad11
₹2 lakh – ₹25 lakhCommissioner9
Below ₹2 lakhDeputy Commissioner7
  • The founder's family member and ex-officio members are counted over and above these numbers. The archaka (or chief archaka) is an ex-officio member; two members must be eminent philanthropists.
  • Representation (S.17): at least one woman; 50% of seats (leaving out ex-officio members) for SC, ST and BC; one Nayee Brahmin (Act 15 of 2023); one Brahmin (Act 26 of 2024). Act 26 of 2024 raised every slab by two (15→17, 11→13, 9→11, 9→11, 7→9, 5→7).
  • Term: 2 years. Age: at least 30. Oath within 30 days or the office is lost. Chairman elected within 60 days (S.20). Absent from 3 consecutive meetings → membership lost (S.21).
  • S.16: hereditary trusteeship abolished; a founder or his qualified family member is still appointed (S.17).
  • S.19 lists disqualifications (insolvency, interest in a lease or contract, arrears, conviction for moral turpitude, being an employee or lawyer of the institution). Act 12 of 2026 removes leprosy from the list, from a date to be notified.
  • S.28: suspension, removal or dismissal of a trustee after notice. S.135: the Government may supersede a board; S.137: a Specified Authority runs the institution for up to one year.

The Dharmika Parishad (S.152).

  • Inserted by Act 33 of 2007 (definition S.2(10-A)). 21 members: 4 official (Endowments Minister as Chairman, Revenue Principal Secretary or Secretary, Commissioner as Member Secretary, TTD EO) and 17 non-official (6 board chairmen, 2 Mathadhipatis, a retired High Court judge, Agama scholars, a chartered accountant and others).
  • Act 32 of 2021: if the full Parishad is not constituted, the four official members act for it.
  • Powers: appoints boards of ₹25 lakh–₹1 crore temples; over mutts it removes a Mathadhipati (S.51; appeal to the High Court in 90 days), fills temporary vacancies (S.52), recognises successors (Ss.53–54; nomination reported in 90 days) and frames a scheme for a mismanaged mutt (S.55; committee of up to 5; appeal in 60 days).

The Endowments Tribunal (S.162).

  • Set up by the Government (Act 33 of 2007); Chairman a judicial officer not below District Judge, Member not below Additional Commissioner.
  • S.87: decides whether an institution is charitable or religious, whether property is endowment property or a specific endowment, who is the founder, and claims to honours or emoluments. S.88: appeal to the High Court within 90 days. S.89: compromise. S.83(6) (2023): appeal against an eviction order within 15 days.

Mutts (Chapter V). A mutt is in list 6(d) under the Commissioner. S.48 keeps several Chapter III sections (trust boards, EO) away from mutts; S.50 covers pada-kanukas (offerings to the Mathadhipati personally).

Archakas and hereditary rights.

  • S.34: hereditary rights of peda jiyyangar, chinna jiyyangar, mirasidars, archakas and others abolished, with their emoluments. Act 33 of 2007 added S.34(3): qualified members of archaka families continue in archakatvam, paid under a S.144 scheme. Act 26 of 2020 added S.34(4): the Sannidhi Yadavs of TTD keep their hereditary rights.
  • S.36 (qualifications): pass an archaka examination recognised by the Commissioner; no physical deformity or contagious disease; recite mantras clearly; good conduct; free of the sapta vyasanas (seven vices).
  • S.144: shares in hundi, arati plate, ticket fees and other rusums abolished; after 2007 this applies only to institutions with income above ₹5 lakh.

Offences.

  • S.147: a trustee or EO who fails to keep the register (S.43), fails to furnish accounts, or obstructs an inspection may be fined; courts take cognizance only on the Commissioner's written complaint, before a magistrate not below First Class; the fine comes from the trustee's own pocket.
  • S.157: trustees, board members, the EO and staff are public servants.
  • Encroachment on endowment property is a cognizable offence after Act 36 of 2023 (see HC-EL notes).

Constitutional basis.

  • Article 25(1): freedom of conscience and religion, subject to public order, morality and health. 25(2)(a): the State may regulate economic, financial, political or other secular activity linked to religion. 25(2)(b): social reform and opening Hindu public temples to all. Its Explanation II counts Sikhs, Jains and Buddhists as Hindus, as S.2(30) does.
  • Article 26: a denomination may (a) set up institutions, (b) manage its own affairs in matters of religion, (c) own property and (d) administer it in accordance with law.
  • The Supreme Court upheld the 1987 Act: Pannalal Bansilal Pitti (1996) on abolishing hereditary trusteeship, and A.S. Narayana Deekshitulu (1996) on abolishing hereditary archakatvam. Appointing an archaka is a secular act; what he does in worship is religious and stays protected.

Common traps

  • ✗ "The 1987 Act came from the Justice Reddy or Dhar Commission." ✓ Justice Challa Kondaiah Commission (report 28-2-1986).
  • ✗ "The Commissioner chairs the Dharmika Parishad." ✓ The Minister for Endowments chairs; the Commissioner is Member Secretary.
  • ✗ "The Dharmika Parishad has 15 members." ✓ 21 (4 official, 17 non-official).
  • ✗ "The Tribunal is headed by the Commissioner." ✓ By a judicial officer not below District Judge.
  • ✗ "Boards of ₹25 lakh–₹1 crore temples are named by the Government." ✓ By the Dharmika Parishad.
  • ✗ "The top trust board still has 15 members." ✓ 17 since Act 26 of 2024 (10-2-2025).
  • ✗ "'Religious charity' means any public charity at any festival." ✓ One linked to a Hindu festival or religious observance.
  • ✗ "An archaka includes the EO." ✓ It includes pujari, panda and archakatvam mirasidar, not the EO.
  • ✗ "Section 144 deals with resumption of inams." ✓ S.144 abolishes shares in hundi and rusums; inams are S.77.
  • ✗ "Article 26 bars the State from managing temple property." ✓ Denominations administer property in accordance with law; the State may regulate the secular side.

Quick revision

  • Act 30 of 1987, in force 28-5-1987; Challa Kondaiah Commission; repealed Act 17 of 1966 and the TTD Act 1979.
  • Amendments: 33/2007 (Parishad, Tribunal, S.29), 36/2023 (S.83), 26/2024 (boards +2, Brahmin trustee).
  • S.15 boards: 17 / 13 / 11 by Government; 11 by Parishad; 9 by Commissioner; 7 by DC.
  • Board: one woman, 50% SC/ST/BC, one Nayee Brahmin, one Brahmin; 2-year term; age 30; oath in 30 days.
  • S.16 hereditary trusteeship, S.34 hereditary archaka rights, S.144 hundi shares: abolished.
  • S.152 Dharmika Parishad: 21 members, Minister chairs, Commissioner member-secretary; removes Mathadhipatis.
  • S.162 Tribunal: Chairman of District Judge rank; S.88 appeal to the High Court in 90 days.
  • Archaka = pujari, panda, mirasidar; religious charity = linked to a Hindu festival; Hindu includes Buddhist, Jain, Sikh.
  • S.147 fines on Commissioner's complaint; S.157 trustees and EO are public servants.
  • Articles 25(2)(a) and 26; Pannalal Bansilal Pitti and Narayana Deekshitulu (1996) upheld the Act.
Go deeper: Deeper (beyond what APPSC Paper I usually asks)

Deeper Advanced

  • The essential practices test. In the Shirur Mutt case (1954) the Supreme Court held that the State may regulate administration but not what a religion treats as essential. The Endowments Act follows that line: officers must respect custom (S.13), the Trust Board cannot change Agamas or modes of worship, and the EO and inspecting officers must be Hindus.
  • Why the Commission was set up. Hereditary trustees and mirasidars treated temple income and lands as private property, rituals were neglected, and the 1966 and 1979 Acts could not stop it. The Commission proposed abolishing hereditary rights, paying archakas salaries, professional EOs and income-based control.
  • Why 2007 softened 1987. The objects of Act 33 of 2007 record that many village temples had closed because archakas could not live on salaries the institutions could not pay. Hence the restored family right to archakatvam (S.34(3)) and the ₹5 lakh floor on S.144.
  • Other review powers. S.90 appeals, S.91 revision (the High Court's revision over Tribunal orders under S.83(6) since 2023), S.92 (Commissioner) and S.93 (Government) may call for records and pass orders.
  • Penalty figures in S.147: a fine of up to ₹200, plus up to ₹100 for each week the default continues beyond a month; the Commissioner may compound the offence for at least ₹1,000.

Sources: A.P. Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 (Act 30 of 1987), Telugu edition with amendments up to Act 26 of 2024 (Asia Law House): introduction, Ss.1–2, 14–28, 34, 36, 43, 47–56, 87–94, 135–137, 144, 147, 152, 157, 162; BOOK FINAL COPY (EO Paper II guide), chapter 13 (Trust Board, Dharmika Parishad, Tribunal, ten amendments); Constitution of India, Articles 25–26; Seventh Schedule, List III entry 28; A.S. Narayana Deekshitulu v. State of A.P. (1996); Pannalal Bansilal Pitti v. State of A.P. (1996); APPSC EO Paper II previous papers (2023, 2026)

Last checked 2026-10-22.

Practise this topic. Questions on Act framework: classification, trustees, Commissioner, Dharmika Parishad, with answers explained.

Medha AI writes its own notes and checks them against the sources listed. Medha AI is an independent preparation service. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by or connected to APPSC, TSPSC, MPSC, UPSC or any other commission or government body.