7 Universalisation of Elementary Education · 7.1 Universalisation of elementary education
7.1.3 Wastage and stagnation
Wastage is a child leaving school before completing the primary (now elementary) course; stagnation is a child kept in the same class for more than one year; the Hartog Committee (1929) first showed how large both were in primary education, about 65% of wastage comes from poverty, and the cures are economic support, better teachers and teaching, and no needless failure.
- APPSC Paper I
- Standard level
- 16 min read
- Free
Core facts
- Wastage: a child leaves school before completing the prescribed class or stage (2019 key: "before they complete the prescribed age or class"). The BRAOU text equates wastage with the number of dropouts. The time, money and effort already spent on that child are lost; hence "wastage". Modern word: dropout.
- Stagnation: a child takes longer than the prescribed time to clear a class, i.e. is retained in the same class for more than one year (2022 key). BRAOU treats stagnation as synonymous with failure. Modern words: repetition, detention.
- Universal retention: every enrolled child moves up year to year (no stagnation) and stays until the course is complete (no wastage). Retention is achieved only when the system is free from both problems.
- Pairing to remember: wastage is a problem of retention (the school's holding power); stagnation is a problem of promotion (the school's efficiency). Together they measure the internal efficiency of an education system.
- Level: both are problems mainly of the primary level (2022 and 2025 keys); the heaviest loss is in Class I.
- Link: a child who fails again and again (stagnation) usually ends up leaving (wastage). A child can show both: repeat Class III, then leave in Class IV.
- Hartog Committee (1929): chairman Sir Philip Hartog; an auxiliary committee of the Simon Commission (Indian Statutory Commission). It was the first to point out massive wastage and stagnation in primary education (2022 key). Report: *Review of the Growth of Education in British India*.
- Hartog's figures: of every 100 children in Class I (1922-23), only about 19 (roughly one in five) were in Class IV in 1925-26. Advice: consolidation of existing schools rather than hasty expansion; a primary course of at least four years.
- Share of causes (B.Ed. textbook figures, 2022 key): about 65% of wastage in primary education is due to poverty; only about 30% is due to educational causes. So economic causes are the chief cause.
- Socio-economic causes (2022 key): poverty, inequality of the sexes, illiteracy and rampant superstition.
- Remedies keyed by APPSC:
- appoint qualified teachers, to give better quality in the instructional programme and attract children (2022);
- open special institutions in each State or at district level for children with intellectual disability (the paper's old term: "mentally retarded") (2022);
- removal of heterogeneity in society (2025).
- Kothari Commission (1964–66): treat Classes I and II as one ungraded unit, so no child fails at the very start.
- RTE Act 2009: Section 16 banned holding back and expulsion till Class VIII; the 2019 amendment lets States hold back children in Classes V and VIII who fail a re-examination. Section 4: a child who dropped out joins an age-appropriate class with special training.
- Measurement: the cohort method follows one batch of children from Class I year by year: true, apparent and reconstructed (UNESCO) cohorts; coefficient of efficiency 1.0 = no wastage or stagnation.
Explained
1. The two terms side by side.
| Point | Wastage | Stagnation |
|---|---|---|
| Meaning | leaving before the course ends | repeating the same class (more than one year in it) |
| Modern word | dropout | repetition / detention / failure |
| Problem of | retention, holding power | promotion, efficiency |
| Measure | dropout rate, survival rate | repetition rate |
Why both are a loss: the money, time and effort spent on a child who leaves early do not give lasting literacy, and a child who repeats a class occupies a seat and teacher time for extra years, so the cost per child who completes rises. Both slow universalisation of elementary education (UEE). The BRAOU text adds that the drive for universal primary education fell short partly because quality control of primary schools was neglected: quantity without quality produced wastage.
2. The Hartog Committee (1928–29).
| Point | Fact |
|---|---|
| Parent body | Indian Statutory (Simon) Commission, appointed 1927 |
| Committee | auxiliary committee on education, appointed 1928, reported 1929 |
| Chairman | Sir Philip Hartog, earlier first Vice-Chancellor of Dacca University |
| Report | Review of the Growth of Education in British India |
- Background: under the Montagu-Chelmsford reforms (1919, in force 1921) education became a provincial transferred subject under Indian ministers, and enrolment grew fast.
- Finding: most children left before Class IV, the stage at which literacy is thought to last; those who left earlier soon relapsed into illiteracy. Many others repeated classes. Hartog was the first to name both losses: wastage and stagnation.
- Advice: consolidation and improvement instead of mere expansion; at least a four-year primary course; trained, better-paid teachers and closer inspection; school hours and holidays suited to local needs and seasons; at the middle stage, diversion of pupils to industrial and commercial courses.
- Not Hartog: basic education through a productive craft (Wardha scheme, Gandhi, 1937); the first education commission of British India (Hunter Commission, 1882); university education (Radhakrishnan Commission, 1948–49); "Learning without Burden" (Yashpal Committee, 1993).
3. Causes of wastage and stagnation.
| Type | Examples |
|---|---|
| Economic (chief, about 65%) | poverty; child labour; child kept home to earn or mind siblings; hidden costs of books, clothes, travel |
| Social (socio-economic) | illiterate or indifferent parents; inequality of the sexes; superstition; early marriage of girls; caste barriers; purdah; seasonal migration; social heterogeneity |
| Educational (about 30%) | dull curriculum unrelated to life; untrained or absent teachers; single-teacher schools; strict annual examination and detention; poor buildings, no water or toilets; distance; unsuitable timings |
| Personal | ill health, malnutrition, slow learning, disability, irregular attendance |
- Poverty works even when tuition is free: the family loses the child's earnings or help (opportunity cost) and still pays for books and clothes.
- Children at highest risk: girls (housework, sibling care, early marriage, no separate toilets, distance), first-generation learners (parents never schooled), children of migrant and farm-labour families, children with disabilities.
- Single-teacher, multi-class schools: one teacher cannot give each class enough attention, so more pupils fail (stagnation).
- Early stagnation: classically blamed on a strict examination and detention at the end of Class I; hence Kothari's ungraded unit and the RTE no-detention rule.
- Warning sign: irregular attendance (absenteeism) usually comes before dropping out.
4. NCERT suggestions (BRAOU text). To reduce wastage: adjust school schedules (hours); adjust vacations to local farm seasons, when children are needed in the fields; tackle parental indifference (parent awareness, adult literacy, SMC meetings); increase the attracting and holding power of schools.
5. Remedies, by type.
| Type | Remedies |
|---|---|
| Economic | free education; mid-day meal (1995, for enrolment and retention; PM POSHAN since 2021); free textbooks, uniforms; scholarships; bicycles for girls; ban on child labour enforced |
| Social | parent awareness, adult literacy; SMCs (RTE s.21); women teachers and girls' facilities; hostels and residential schools for SC, ST, BC children; removal of heterogeneity and inequalities in society |
| Educational | qualified, trained teachers; play-way and activity methods; child-centred curriculum; continuous evaluation instead of one annual test; remedial teaching for slow learners; ungraded Classes I–II; part-time and non-formal classes for working children; RTE special training for re-admitted dropouts |
| Special needs | special institutions in each State or district for children with intellectual disability; inclusive support for other disabilities |
- Why continuous evaluation helps: a child is not failed on one year-end test, so stagnation falls.
- Remedial teaching: extra help in a slow learner's weak areas; it cuts failure and so stagnation.
- Women teachers in rural schools mainly reduce wastage among girls; free bicycles for girls in secondary classes cut dropout caused by distance.
- Hostels and residential schools remove poverty and distance barriers, so poor and remote children stay in school.
- Detaining weak pupils every year is NOT a remedy: it creates stagnation.
6. National programmes against wastage.
| Programme | Year | Link to retention |
|---|---|---|
| Operation Blackboard | 1987 | minimum essential facilities: rooms, teachers, teaching aids |
| DPEP | 1994 | district plans to cut primary dropout below 10% |
| Mid-day meal | 1995 | food draws children in and keeps them |
| Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan | 2001 | goal: universal retention at elementary stage by 2010 |
| Samagra Shiksha | 2018 | one scheme for pre-school to Class XII |
7. Measuring wastage and stagnation.
| Method / measure | Meaning |
|---|---|
| True cohort | tracks the same pupils year by year (most exact, needs pupil records) |
| Apparent cohort | compares Class I enrolment of one year with Class V enrolment four years later; weakness: ignores repeaters and transfers |
| Reconstructed cohort (UNESCO) | rebuilds the flow from promotion, repetition and dropout rates |
| Dropout / repetition / survival rate | % who leave a class in a year / % who repeat it (direct index of stagnation) / % of a Class I cohort reaching the last class |
- Pupil-years: in a five-year course, a pupil promoted every year uses 5 pupil-years. That is the ideal.
- Coefficient of efficiency = ideal pupil-years for those who completed ÷ pupil-years actually used. Example: 100 pupils use 500 pupil-years and 60 complete; ideal = 60 × 5 = 300; coefficient = 300 ÷ 500 = 0.6. 1.0 = no wastage or stagnation.
- Input-output ratio = pupil-years used per pupil who completes (the reciprocal idea): 400 pupil-years ÷ 50 completers = 8 years per graduate, against an ideal of 5.
- Simple wastage %: 200 admitted to Class I, 130 complete Class V: lost = 70, i.e. 35%.
- Today (UDISE+ 2023-24): annual dropout about 1.9% primary, 5.2% upper primary, 14.1% secondary: the problem has moved up to the secondary stage.
AP angle
- AP's residential societies are a direct remedy for wastage among poor and remote children: APTWREIS (tribal welfare) runs schools mainly for Scheduled Tribe children; the social welfare (APSWREIS) and BC welfare (MJPAPBCWREIS) societies and the welfare hostels run by Hostel Welfare Officers do the same for SC and BC children.
- Samagra Shiksha, Andhra Pradesh runs RTE special training, free textbooks and uniforms, and tracking of out-of-school children.
Common traps
- ✗ "Wastage means repeating a class." ✓ Repeating a class is stagnation; wastage is leaving before completion.
- ✗ "Stagnation is staying in a class for one year." ✓ It is staying in the same class for more than one year.
- ✗ "Wastage and stagnation are mainly problems of secondary education." ✓ The papers key them to the primary level (today's highest annual dropout is secondary, but that is a different question).
- ✗ "The Hunter Commission (1882) or the Wardha Committee first reported wastage." ✓ The Hartog Committee, 1929. Hunter was the first education commission; Wardha (1937) was basic education through craft.
- ✗ "Hartog recommended rapid expansion of primary schools." ✓ Consolidation rather than expansion.
- ✗ "Most wastage comes from bad teaching." ✓ About 65% is from poverty; educational causes are only about 30%.
- ✗ "Poverty and superstition are educational causes." ✓ They are socio-economic causes.
- ✗ "Wastage is a problem of promotion." ✓ Wastage = retention; stagnation = promotion.
- ✗ "The apparent cohort method tracks the same pupils." ✓ That is the true cohort; apparent cohort just compares enrolments and ignores repeaters.
- ✗ "The RTE Act still forbids all detention up to Class VIII." ✓ Since 2019, States may detain in Classes V and VIII after a re-examination; expulsion stays banned.
Quick revision
- Wastage = leaving before completing the class or stage (dropouts); stagnation = more than one year in the same class (failure).
- Universal retention = no wastage + no stagnation; wastage → retention / holding power, stagnation → promotion / efficiency.
- Both mainly primary level; worst in Class I.
- Hartog Committee 1929 (Simon Commission), Sir Philip Hartog: first to report them; 100 in Class I → about 19 in Class IV; consolidation, not expansion; four-year primary course.
- About 65% of wastage due to poverty; about 30% due to educational causes.
- Socio-economic causes: poverty, sex inequality, illiteracy, superstition.
- APPSC remedies: qualified teachers; special institutions in each State or district; removal of heterogeneity.
- NCERT: adjust schedules and vacations, tackle parental indifference, raise holding power.
- Kothari: Classes I–II one ungraded unit. RTE s.16 no detention (2019: Classes V and VIII may detain); s.4 special training.
- Cohort method: true, apparent, reconstructed (UNESCO); coefficient of efficiency 1.0 = no wastage.
Go deeper: Deeper (beyond what APPSC Paper I usually asks)
Deeper Advanced
- The no-detention debate. RTE Section 16 (2009) removed stagnation by law, but critics (and many States) argued that automatic promotion lowered learning levels. The 2019 amendment allowed States to detain children in Classes V and VIII after a second examination; the Centre applied it to its own schools in December 2024. Supporters of no-detention point out that repetition was the main road to dropout.
- Hidden (qualitative) wastage. A child promoted every year who still cannot read at the end of Class V is a loss too; ASER and NAS surveys show the scale. NIPUN Bharat (2021) targets foundational literacy and numeracy by Grade 3; NEP 2020 aims to bring about 2 crore out-of-school children back.
- Sargent Report (1944) planned universal basic education for ages 6–14 over forty years; independent India wrote the goal into Article 45 (1950) and later Article 21A (2002, in force 2010).
- Erikson's "generativity vs stagnation" (an adult stage of psychosocial development) has nothing to do with school stagnation; do not mix them.
Practise this topic. Questions on Wastage and stagnation, with answers explained.
All Universalisation of elementary education notes · APPSC Paper I syllabus · APPSC Paper I Mock 1 with answers · Start free
Medha AI writes its own notes and checks them against the sources listed. Medha AI is an independent preparation service. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by or connected to APPSC, TSPSC, MPSC, UPSC or any other commission or government body.