Modernisation, stratification and social mobility

Core facts

Modernisation: the change from a traditional (custom-bound, agrarian, ascriptive) society to a modern one (rational, scientific, industrial, urban, achievement-based). Modernisation does not require giving up every tradition.
Thinkers and works on modernisation:
- Daniel Lerner, The Passing of Traditional Society (1958, the Middle East): the modern person has empathy (the ability to imagine oneself in another's role) and a mobile personality;
- Alex Inkeles and David H. Smith, Becoming Modern (1974): traits of the "modern man" (openness to new experience, readiness for change, faith in science, planning); schooling is the strongest single cause;
- Yogendra Singh, Modernization of Indian Tradition (1973);
- M.N. Srinivas: Westernisation (British influence) differs from modernisation;
- Lloyd and Susanne Rudolph, The Modernity of Tradition (1967): tradition and modernity can co-exist in India.
BRAOU: equality of educational opportunity will ensure a rapid modernisation of the country.
Social stratification: the arrangement of society into ranked layers of unequal wealth, power and prestige.
Melvin Tumin's five features: stratification is social (not biological), ancient, universal, diverse in form and consequential (it affects life chances and lifestyles).
Four forms: slavery, estate (feudal Europe: clergy, nobility, commoners), caste (closed) and class (open).
Caste: membership by birth, endogamy (marriage within the group), hereditary occupation, purity and pollution, restrictions on food and social contact.
- G.S. Ghurye, Caste and Race in India (1932): six features of caste.
- Louis Dumont, Homo Hierarchicus (1966): caste rests on purity and pollution.
- M.N. Srinivas: dominant caste, from his study of Rampura village (Mysore, 1955).
- BRAOU: India has over 3,000 castes, and caste is found among Muslims, Christians and Sikhs too.
Class: based on economic position; achieved; open; mobility possible.
- Karl Marx: class rests on ownership of the means of production; two classes, bourgeoisie (owners) and proletariat (workers who sell their labour); class struggle ends in a classless society.
- Max Weber: three dimensions, class (economic), status (social honour or prestige) and party (power).
Functional theory: Kingsley Davis and Wilbert Moore (1945): stratification is necessary to fill important posts with able people; criticised by Melvin Tumin (1953): it blocks talent among the poor and passes inequality down the generations.
Ralph Linton, The Study of Man (1936): ascribed status (by birth: caste, sex, age) vs achieved status (earned: a district collector, a doctor).
Social distance: the degree of closeness or aloofness (antipathy) that members of one group feel towards another. Measured by E.S. Bogardus's social distance scale (1925), 7 steps from "close kinship by marriage" to "exclude from my country".
Social mobility: movement of a person or group from one social position to another. Classic book: P.A. Sorokin, Social Mobility (1927).
- Vertical (upward or downward) vs horizontal (same level, different position);
- intergenerational (between parents and children) vs intragenerational (within one lifetime);
- structural (from changes in the economy) vs exchange / circulation (some rise, an equal number fall).
Education is the most important channel (ladder) of upward mobility in modern society. A positive impact of education on society: it promotes social mobility (2025 key).
Ralph H. Turner (1960): sponsored mobility (elite picks recruits early, old British grammar schools) vs contest mobility (open competition to the end, USA).
Social aims of education in India:
- Mudaliar Commission (1952-53): four aims, democratic citizenship, vocational efficiency, development of personality, education for leadership;
- Kothari Commission (1964-66), report titled "Education and National Development": five-fold programme, increase productivity, social and national integration, consolidate democracy, modernisation, social, moral and spiritual values.
Constitution: "socialist, secular" added to the Preamble by the 42nd Amendment (1976); Art. 28(1): no religious instruction in institutions wholly maintained by State funds; Art. 30: minorities may establish and run their own institutions; Art. 15(4) (1951) and Art. 46: special provisions for SC, ST and backward classes; Art. 17: untouchability abolished.

Explained

1. Features of modernisation (textbook list).

Rationality and scientific temper in place of superstition.
Industrialisation and urbanisation.
Achievement (merit) in place of ascription (birth).
Secularisation: religion becomes a private matter; public life runs on reason.
Literacy, mass media and wider awareness.
Democratic participation: people take part in decisions.
Social and geographical mobility; the nuclear family spreads.
Universal rules (the same law for all) and specialised roles.

Agents of modernisation in India: education, industrialisation, urbanisation, mass media, the Constitution and law, transport and communication, panchayati raj. Not an agent: hereditary caste occupation. Industry and cities weaken the joint family, caste occupation and the jajmani system (hereditary exchange of goods and services between castes).

2. Parsons's pattern variables (The Social System, 1951; traditional → modern), the usual tool to describe the shift. Parsons gave five pairs; the fifth, self-orientation vs collectivity-orientation, is rarely asked:

Traditional	Modern
Ascription (status by birth)	Achievement (status by performance)
Particularism (rules differ by person)	Universalism (same rules for all)
Affectivity (emotion)	Affective neutrality
Diffuseness (broad relations)	Specificity (limited, role-based)

3. Education and modernisation.

School spreads scientific outlook, new skills and new values (equality, punctuality, planning).
It weakens caste, gender and superstition barriers, builds rational, open-minded citizens and shifts loyalty from caste and region to the nation.
The Kothari Commission names modernisation as one of the five tasks of education and wants education to accelerate it through a science-based culture.
⚠ BRAOU (CIE Unit 17) lists only four Kothari objectives (productivity, integration, modernisation, values) and leaves out "consolidating democracy"; the report itself has five.
Limit: education can also spread mere Westernisation (copying dress and lifestyle) without real change in values.

4. Caste and class compared.

Point	Caste	Class
Basis	birth (ascribed)	wealth, occupation, education (achieved)
System	closed	open
Marriage	endogamous	open choice
Mobility	very low, mainly by group (Sanskritisation)	possible for individuals, through education and income

Ghurye's six features of caste: segmental division of society; hierarchy; restrictions on feeding and social intercourse; civil and religious disabilities and privileges; lack of free choice of occupation; restrictions on marriage (endogamy).

Dominant caste (Srinivas): a caste that is strong in numbers, owns land (economic power), holds political power, and has a fair ritual status and access to Western education.

5. Social distance in the school.

Bogardus's 7 steps (closest first): (1) close kinship by marriage; (2) personal chums in my club; (3) neighbours on my street; (4) colleagues at work; (5) citizens of my country; (6) visitors only; (7) exclusion from my country.
It is one of the oldest attitude scales; others: Thurstone (equal-appearing intervals), Likert (summated ratings), Osgood (semantic differential).
⚠ BRAOU (Social Psychology) dates the scale to 1933; the standard date is 1925.
Where caste, religion, language or class keep groups apart, children may not sit, eat or play together. A hostel or a common school reduces social distance: common meals, mixed seating, shared games and group projects.
A 2025 question defined it as the difference between social groups in cultural development or the antipathy of one group towards another; the standard answer is social distance (the printed key showed "social apathy", which is not the standard term).

6. Types of social mobility.

Type	Meaning	Example
Vertical upward / downward	rise or fall in rank	a shop owner ruined by a flood becomes a daily-wage labourer (downward)
Horizontal	change of position at the same level	a teacher transferred to a school of the same grade in another district
Intergenerational / intragenerational	parents vs children / within one career	a labourer's son becomes a doctor / a clerk becomes branch manager
Structural / exchange	new jobs from economic change / swap of positions	IT jobs drawing farmers' children

Sorokin's channels of vertical mobility: the army, the church, the school, political organisations, economic organisations, occupational groups, the family (through marriage). Not a channel: inherited caste occupation.
Status inconsistency: high on one dimension, low on another (a Ph.D. holder in a low-paid contract job).
Group mobility in caste: a whole caste rises through Sanskritisation, caste associations and reservations. Srinivas: Sanskritisation brings positional change within the hierarchy, not structural change of the system.

7. Education and social mobility.

Education gives qualifications, skills and contacts, so it opens jobs that birth once closed; it reduces stratification most directly by opening better jobs to all groups on merit.
Reservation in admissions and jobs (Art. 15(4), 16(4)) and scholarships, hostels and residential schools make the ladder reachable for SC, ST, BC and minority children.
Meritocracy (Michael Young, The Rise of the Meritocracy, 1958): position = ability + effort, with education as the sorter.
Low mobility (BRAOU, CIE 15.1): where opportunities are unequal, a person's economic success can be predicted from family background such as caste and religion; this keeps poverty going across generations.
John Roemer's equality of opportunity (cited by BRAOU): schooling should vary with a person's own effort, not with family background or other traits he cannot control.
Growth with inequality (BRAOU): primary enrolment rose from 19.2 million (1950–51) to 113.6 million (2001); literacy from about 18% (1951) to about 65% (2001); yet India's educational inequality is among the highest in the world, with gaps by gender, caste and religion.
BRAOU's causes of unequal opportunity: socio-economic status, gender disparity, regional imbalance, physical differences, social stratification, lack of opportunities, differences in ability.
Limit: unequal schools (private vs government, English vs mother tongue) can also reproduce inequality: Bourdieu's cultural capital; Bowles and Gintis (1976), the correspondence principle.

8. Education and development.

T.W. Schultz (1961) and Gary Becker (Human Capital, 1964): spending on education is an investment that raises productivity (human capital theory).
Gunnar Myrdal, Asian Drama (1968): education as a condition for development in South Asia. His wife Alva Myrdal won the Nobel Peace Prize (1982).
2025 asked who said that the paramount role in any development great enough to benefit the whole future world belongs to education; the key was Alva Myrdal (printed "Alva Hydal"), with Horton and Hunt, Barbara Ward and Lakshmi Menon as the other options. The quotation cannot be traced in standard sources; remember the key, not the line.
The Kothari report calls equality of opportunity a key social objective: education should let backward and underprivileged groups improve their condition.

9. Democracy, secularism and socialism as aims of education.

Value	What the school does	Source
Democracy	student councils, discussion, respect for others' views, equal treatment	Dewey, Democracy and Education (1916); Mudaliar
Secularism	respect for all religions (sarva dharma samabhava); no religious instruction in State schools	Preamble (1976); Art. 28
Socialism	equality, removal of exploitation; aim of a classless society	Preamble (1976)
Equality and fraternity	common school, mixed seating, mid-day meals	Preamble; Kothari

Secular education in India is not anti-religious; it means the State has no religion and treats all faiths equally.

AP angle

The post itself is part of the mobility ladder: AP's welfare hostels and the residential societies (APSWREIS for SC, APTWREIS for ST, MJPAPBCWREIS for BC children) give poor and first-generation learners boarding, food and coaching so they can reach college and jobs.
A Hostel Welfare Officer's daily work (common dining, mixed rooms, study hours, scholarship help) is the practical side of reducing social distance and supporting upward mobility.

Common traps

✗ "Modernisation and Westernisation are the same." ✓ Westernisation (Srinivas) copies British ways; modernisation is universal reason and science.
✗ "Caste is an open system." ✓ Caste is closed (birth); class is open (achievement).
✗ "Social distance is social apathy." ✓ The standard term for group aloofness or antipathy is social distance (Bogardus scale, 1925, 7 steps).
✗ "Social Mobility was written by Ogburn." ✓ P.A. Sorokin, 1927. (Ogburn: cultural lag.)
✗ "Horizontal mobility changes one's rank." ✓ Vertical changes rank; horizontal changes position at the same level.
✗ "Weber's three dimensions are caste, class and power." ✓ Class, status and party.
✗ "Tumin gave the functional theory." ✓ Davis and Moore (1945); Tumin criticised it (1953) and gave the five features.
✗ "Ascribed and achieved status: Weber." ✓ Ralph Linton, The Study of Man (1936).
✗ "Dominant caste: Ghurye / Majumdar." ✓ M.N. Srinivas (Rampura).
✗ "Education for leadership is a Kothari aim." ✓ It is one of the Mudaliar Commission's (1952-53) four aims.

Quick revision

Lerner 1958 (empathy); Inkeles and Smith 1974 (schooling makes modern); Yogendra Singh 1973.
Tumin: stratification social, ancient, universal, diverse, consequential.
Caste closed (birth, endogamy); class open; Ghurye 1932, six features; Dumont 1966, purity-pollution.
Srinivas: dominant caste (Rampura); Sanskritisation = positional, not structural change.
Marx: means of production, classless society; Weber: class, status, party.
Davis and Moore 1945 (functional) vs Tumin 1953; Linton 1936: ascribed vs achieved.
Social distance: Bogardus scale, 1925, 7 steps.
Sorokin 1927: vertical vs horizontal; school a channel; Turner: sponsored vs contest.
Education = main ladder of upward mobility (2025); human capital (Schultz 1961).
Mudaliar 4 aims (democratic citizenship, leadership); Kothari 5-fold programme.

Go deeper: Deeper (beyond what APPSC Paper I usually asks)

Deeper Advanced

1. Indian debates on modernisation.

Yogendra Singh studied change at two levels (structural: caste, family, economy; cultural: values, Great and Little Traditions) and two sources (orthogenetic, from within, and heterogenetic, from contact with the West).
Rudolphs: caste associations used modern politics (voting, petitions) to raise their status, so tradition itself became a tool of modernity.
Westernisation vs modernisation: Westernisation is tied to one culture (British); modernisation is universal (science, rationality) and can grow from Indian roots.

2. Theories of stratification side by side.

Theory	Key idea	Thinker
Functional	inequality motivates talent into important jobs	Davis and Moore (1945)
Conflict	inequality comes from control of production and is passed on	Marx
Multi-dimensional	class, status and party differ	Weber
Purity-pollution	caste rests on religious ideas of purity	Dumont

3. Elite theories. Vilfredo Pareto: the circulation of elites, "lions" (force) and "foxes" (cunning) replace each other in power. Gaetano Mosca, The Ruling Class: an organised minority always rules the unorganised majority.

4. Measuring mobility. In India much recent mobility is structural (more office jobs, fewer farm jobs), which is why access to schooling decides who fills the new posts. Downward mobility comes from job loss, impoverishment or failure in education; dropout limits mobility.

Medha AI writes its own notes and checks them against the sources listed. Medha AI is an independent preparation service. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by or connected to APPSC, TSPSC, MPSC, UPSC or any other commission or government body.

2.1.3 Modernisation, stratification and social mobility

Download this PDF